🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are paid to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to remove Black history and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration represents how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.